Awaiting reviewer invitation after minor revision reddit I have submitted a paper to an Elsevier journal and have already gone through 4 rounds of peer review and the editors have suggested a major revision each time. In this section: NEW! Featured Author Support; Tracking your submission; My paper has been accepted – what next? Appeals and rebuttals; BMJ Article Transfer Se Popular Articles. Recruiting new reviewers to evaluate a The first reviewer stated that if the article is re-written, it could be published. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few 论文小修后await. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo [email protected] Submitted my paper. Recommendation can also be "get reviewer to clarify" so it goes back to the review cycle. minor revision을 요청하는 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? Awaiting recommendations: waiting for an editor to make a recommendation Recommendation can be "get another review" so it goes back to the review cycle. The second one gave a more thorough review, raised some good questions, and said the general idea is good, but made no comment about whether the article should be published or not. Decision notification e-mails and what they mean. On April 20th, we received an acceptance email. R1: Accept As Regular Paper After Minor Revision; R2: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. 25 Manuscript Received (status after minor revision) 2022. 08. But usually, the paper with minor revision will be sent directly back to the same reviewers for the final decision. Please be civil, keep it on topic, and follow the subreddit rules and reddiquette. Then it will take probably one month to get your work accepted. Know what the reviewers have asked you to do. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The identified After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. However, the editor has sent out another review invitation (#5 Reviewer). After waiting 20 days for pending approval, the status now is reviewers invited. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. Other reviews are still in progress. In both cases, you're making reviewer-suggested changes and sending your manuscript back. 07 Resubmitted, Under review 2022. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. 4 Minor revision after second review, 22. This change has occurred On February 28th, we received the first round of revisions, which included two major revisions and one minor revision. That they haven't done that may be a sign that the third reviewer has asked for an extension. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Awaiting EA (Associated Editor) decision. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. I wrote an email to the editor asking if everything is ok and if I can be of further assistance, and they then sent it for review immediately after. " After a month, the scores were received, and a recommendation was made. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the publication but the associate editor might have sent a few more invitations around. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. This change has occurred In most cases, if a paper is returned after a relatively minor revision, and you are satisfied that the authors have addressed the concerns of the reviewers, you do not need to send the paper out for another round of reviews. To submit for review after major revision, go through the review stage again. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. Then, I have made all the necessary modifications and resubmitted. 05. What will be the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS. You said you recommended rejection twice now, and somewhat harshly because you perceived fatal flaws (that I assume you don't believe can be addressed in a revision). The The status of the article is on awaiting reviewer scores. There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. If your work gets rejected at ICML and you try again with the fixed version at NeurIPS, then this is akin to a minor/major revision at Journals. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. 5. I know it's typically a bad sign if the reviews as a whole take only a short time (for example, the paper has the "under review" status only for a few days). After 6 weeks I got a decision to reject it though the editor-in-chief acknowledged that the peer review was positive!! in fact the two peer reviewers had only minor comments that should have led However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but I don't know what "awaiting reviewer invitation" means. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. The Elsevier Tracking system shows the following: Detailed Reviewer Activity. Manuscripts quite often return to this stage if not enough of the invited reviewers accepted the invitation so further invitations need to be sent. Accept after minor revision, without re-review no need to submit for review. I would recommend asking respectfully, showing that you understand they are busy. It is possible. Is that a bad sign? Then after submiting the minor revisions and waiting for two months I got major revision request and I was shocked. Reconsideration after major revision. Stack Exchange Network. 20 Accept As Regular Paper The text translates to: 2021. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? A major revision would normally go back to the same reviewers and they would usually have as much time to review as the original submission. Then, a few days ago, the status went to "review complete". 30 Awaiting Decision 2022. The . 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。原因有以下几点：1. There's plenty of reasons for a minor delay like this. . 16 awaiting Editor-in-Chief decision, 22. IMPORTANT NOTE: Any comments with links to Fiverr will be Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating Posted by u/Mountain-Ad-4557 - 17 votes and 29 comments I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2. 09 Under review 2023. If you intend for the reviewers to verify the revisions, you should NOT choose Minor Revision. To check the status of your submission in o If they do reject it without review, that week delay the paper was probably on the AE's to-do list. If a Major Revision does not advance to Minor Revision, the paper should be considered for rejection. 3 Resubmission 2022. This change has occurred After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. Revise and resubmit is the same thing as revisions. Since then, it has been more than 2 months, but we have yet to get a decision. 2022. 2023. 11. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. ’ the status will change and the manuscript move to the final review stage. Some journals show the under review status from the time the paper gets to the editor in chief through to the reviewers. Also, the second round took 8 months. A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. I re-submitted the paper after incorporating these changes in the manuscript (I work in Biology field). 04. The AE had to urge the reviewer. The main concern of the reviewer was to add the details in methods section and some amendments in the text. This will help us the AE to find other reviewers in a timely manner. Assess and Recommend. These revisions were trivial, and so I resubmitted after one week. However, after I performed minor edits and resubmitted it, it went to under-review. As a reviewer, you are under no obligation to continue providing reviews. Send the paper out for subsequent rounds of review only if there remains doubt as to the acceptability of the paper. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. This stage indicates that your submission has passed the initial checks and is now awaiting assignment to a peer reviewer who will assess the changes you made in the revised version. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. Geophysics is now a leader among Did you sent the updated version (after minor revision) in January -> two months it is fine to send an email to ask for an update Or did you sent your things 17th of March -> less then two weeks, so just be patient and if you haven't heard anything by mid April maybe email disclaimer: just my opinion, field and situation might differ. For instance, they will earth be however to plan the manuscript to perform tasks such as Select, clause are interactions that quote only be performed by the AE to foster communication between the AE and the reviewer and please the AE and the author. I’ve also had the “here’s a major revision, but f*** you if you can actually complete the work” long shot type of major revisions. 06 Minor Revision 2023. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. The manuscript is likely to be accepted after authors address requests for revision that do not involve major re-working of the data analysis and presentation or of the organization and text of the manuscript. After conducting additional experiments and making careful modifications, we resubmitted the paper on April 10th. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After submitting. Review was severely delayed: The review was I submitted a journal article a few months ago and, after going through 1 round of major revisions, I just got a decision that the paper requires minor revisions. 29 Awaiting Referee Reports 2022. It’ll take work and a second revision after this one most likely, but I’m confident we will get it done. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. To check the status of your submission in o The status has been stuck in "Under Review" since submission. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Does this I recently received two very positive reviews requiring minor edits in the IEEE Access journal. My question is how did it happen after minor revisions? From the start the 3rd reviewer was highly rejective while the first two positive. Review was slightly delayed: The review was submitted less than 7 days after the agreed review due date. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". And I am sure neither of them was the initial reviewer. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. This change has occurred [email protected] Submitted my paper. I just got a major revision request and the feedback seems pretty straightforward to address. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Hi. Is it normal for the status to change from under review to awaiting reviewer After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. Submitted on 11. The comments were entirely new. If a manuscript is rejected, do not give up. Both reviews were positive about the future of the article. And until now, the status has not changed for two months. I still can't figure out why the editor sent the manuscript to a different reviewer after the revision; it was a minor revision. blogspot. To request extensions for revisions. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. 5 months is quite a long time. I checked this AM and the status is "awaiting resubmission". This change has occurred Some journals have this weird category “reject with invitation to resubmit,” which functions as an alternative to “major revisions. After 5 months I received a "Major revision". So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. 투고하고 6개월 후 major revise 받았고 1달에 걸쳐 수정하여 제출했습니다. I made the changes, and then they each sent out lists with 6 or so substantive changes (eg re-work this 4 page discussion section to respond to X idea). What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. 10. " What was odd was that the two reviewers for the second round did not talk about my revision at all, but treated the manuscript as a new submission. Re-submitted after revision on 7. There’s only 1 comment, and I’ll probably submit the revision tomorrow- it won’t have to undergo peer review again, so I expect it will be accepted by next week. the status went to "review complete". But my question is as below. Different journals will explicitly say "revise and resubmit" or "we will be happy to look at Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. Ou 2021-10-04 2021-7-9 submitted 2021-8-8 Reject (Resubmission Allowed) 2021-8-26 resubmission 2021-9-17 Minor Revision Required I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. After six months, I received the reviews and was asked to do major revisions. Or check it out in the app stores They basically said they would like me to resubmit it after “minor revision and modification” and “please outline every change made in response to their (reviewers’) comments and provide suitable rebuttals for any comments not addressed Minor Revision. (To be sure, the kinds of minor revisions I've suggested may also be necessary as part of a broader slate of major revisions for an article. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 23, major revision on 10. I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. But I wouldn't make any assumptions about who or what reviewer three is. You/your corresponding author can absolutely reach out to the editor and politely ask what the situation is. But it's not uncommon to send the revised version back to the reviewers Q: Why is the status of my revised manuscript showing "Awaiting reviewer assignment"? I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. uk has a great post or two about why review can take Hi everyone. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. Once you receive a review invitation, please respond at your earliest convenience even if you cannot review. Humanities Reviewer 1 says to accept with minor revisions, reviewer 2 says to reject without recourse. Has anyone experienced similar situation? I have posted before and received The most likely scenario seems to be that the editor send your work after minor revision to the referee who was asking for it. Many common questions are answered in the Fiverr Help Center and in the Fiverr TOS, which are linked in the subreddit wiki, which also includes links to resources for new sellers looking for tips on getting started the right way. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. a) Is it possible to be rejected at this point? EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Papers should advance in each round of review. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Also, you can do it sooner next time, after a month or so; 2. The editor seemed enthusiastic about the paper, and asked for the revisions before acceptance. A minor revision is close to a contract to publish the paper if certain changes are made. Maybe the . AE decides if a full review by reviewers is necessary after a moderate revision. From the reviewer's standpoint, "minor revision" means "authors should fix this and this, and don Eventually, they reached the stage of "awaiting reviewer scores. For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with Geophysics editors and the SEG publication staff have made strong efforts to reduce the review and publication turnaround times. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. 그로부터 4개월 후 minor revise 받았고1달에 걸쳐 수정하여 제출했습니다. 29 submitted after After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept!" Submitted in November last year, received the first review notice in February this year. One of the reviewers accepted the revised version before this stage At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 1 Awaiting Referee Reports Recently, as a student, I received a review invitation from JPD. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets; Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) Reviewer 1 recommended acceptance with minor revisions and Reviewer 2 wanted major revisions before considering it further. The review deadline given was 15 days, with only four possible outcomes: major revision, minor revision, acceptance • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. This change has occurred (2) Accept after minor revision (no further review): At least one reviewer recommends “Accept after minor revision (no further review)”, and no “Reconsider (re-review) after major revision” or “Reject” is recommended. Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent back to the reviewers. This change has occurred I'm curious if we are still waiting for reviewers to accept the review of the manuscript, like Awaiting Reviewer Invitation, or it's different, and the reviewing process is started already. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. "awaiting reviewer invitation" means that it is awaiting an 2. 13. In addition, the academic editor initially assigned to it was also changed. 02. Or check it out in the app stores [ICLR] Misleading reviewer invitations must stop. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. After 28 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer confirmation". Yet to receive an email. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on There was only one reviewer who provided comments for the minor revision, but after submitting the minor revision, it took 3 weeks and it kept showing "selecting reviewers". Step 10. But the status of the paper is showing "under review" again. 12. There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society's journals: Reject wit Choose Major Revision if a paper has real potential, but a large component should be redone and re-reviewed. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where. I submitted the revised manuscript after one-and-a-half months. Mr. 03. 编辑部或审稿人正在审稿，前者对稿件录用倾向做 In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, while “minor revision” means that while changes should be made, no further reviewing is needed. 22. This is at Cell, but interested to hear from anyone with experience at Elsevier journals! 🤞🏼 Edit: got the email, they’ve sent invitations out to reviewers! After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". I have already addressed 4 peer-reviewers, and in my last submission I addressed the comments of the 4th reviewer. Months later I received a "Minor Revision". I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. I submitted a manuscript in late August, and the article's status hasn't changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" in the last four weeks. Revised in April, received minor revisions in June It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). Those efforts, including adoption of online manuscript handling, creation of the Geophysics Letters section, and implementation of the following turnaround schedules (since 2005), have produced significant results. Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. Respond to a Review Invitation. Now what I got is the 3rd reviewers comments only while others suggested publication. I submitted the revised version. It is rare After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". minor revision 후 under review 들어간 경우 어떤가요? [3] 안녕하세요. 4 Acceptance 吴迪小哥 2022-08-06 Is this a retaliatory mentality after being rejected? I submitted my article earlier this year in January. Computer Science 분야 논문인데요. Rarely rejected after minor revisions unless the author just doesn't make any revisions at all and doesn't qualify why. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. 02 Submitted 2022. The status after 3 days . They need We made the changes requested in the minor revision. Never saw that happen. 编辑很快做出决定。若未经审稿人评审（letter或correspondence除外），稿件几乎都会被拒绝。 6. 17 major revision 22. Reviews completed: 0 Review invitations accepted: 0 Review invitations sent: 2+ Why does it take too long for a reviewer to either accept o reject a revision invitation? and What should I do about this? Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. The initial peer reviews pointed out some flaws, so we were invited to submit a major revision. Under review. Reply reply Top 1% Rank by size . My paper underwent a revision. 14 Submitted 2023. In the second instance, I got a bunch of "this paper is excellent, and should need only minor changes" messages from reviewer 1 and 2. 28 submitted 22. 25 Minor revision 2022. 4. 17 Accepted Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 1 day - Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 1 month and 13 days - Awaiting Reviewer Scores 6 days - Awaiting AE Recommendation Popular Articles. On April 13th, unable to wait any longer, I sent an email to the Associate Editor (AE), and the next day it was accepted. This change has occurred 22. 14 Revise and Resubmit It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". Illness Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. There were 3-4 little modifications required by referees. Anyway, as yours was a minor revision, you probably don’t have much I have a paper on an Elsevier journal with "accept, minor revision". Skip to main content. 9. Choose Major Revision if a paper has real potential, but a large component should So the thing is, I have been looking quite often on the Elsevier tracking system and it seems that many reviewers were invited (2+), after 2 months and only 1 accepted to review. Now, again it Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. This may be true in some journals but not in others. Choose “Minor revision” If reviewers are no longer required and AE wants to QC some key revisions. 3. But "minor revision" means "if you do the listed revisions, and they don't meaningfully change the content of the paper, it'll be accepted". So I got minor revision and just resubmitted it. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". How long does this phase generally take? How long should one wait before reaching out to the Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. More posts you may like A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. After another month, I got back the review, asking to work on minor revisions. But After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. 06 awaiting reviewer scores. 6. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. Handling a During this period, we got a chance to make minor revision. 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 After getting a moderate revision for the manuscript and resubmitting it, it is possible to get moderate revision again, or minor revision, or accept directly without any further edits. "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" 0. This change has occurred I received a minor revision from a good (in my opinion) mathematics journal. How can I check the status of my submitted paper? Modified on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 04:59 PM. 21 Accept As Regular Paper After Minor Revision 2022. Handling the R&R is important. After you accept the invitation, you are expected to assess the paper and make one of the following I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. In my field (medical applications of physics, let's say) minor revision (at the first revision) is purely theoretical. ” I had this with one paper (Medical Care) and I think I had two of these rejections before the minor formatting revision pre-acceptance (longest submission process in my career; one year from first submission to acceptance). 1. Still this step is usually faster because the reviewers don't have to be "re-identified" (assuming they agree to review; otherwise it could take longer for a myriad of reasons). I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. co. What does the following editor response mean in Physical Review journal After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Translation: 21. and rather relied on the comments of th reviewer who asked for revision. Now I am curious about what this might mean. Reject a paper when the submission does not meet publication standards. This means that potential reviewers have been selected, but have yet to be invited. Awaiting reviewer selection. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". Then I revised and resubmitted. 査読者の決定（返答待ち） Awaiting Reviewer Scores. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer I checked the link again after 3 days and I noticed that the date has changed to 19th of April (check the attached image) with the same status of "Review Complete". Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Article status went from Awaiting Decision back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores . I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. 2. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. After 4 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". Editorial review team inadvertently sent the revised paper to new reviewers instead of previous reviewers. academicjournalpublishing. This change has occurred I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. 编辑已接手处理，正在邀请审稿人中。 7. 査読者への依頼待ち. 07. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. To check the status of your submission in o After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". This means that the submission needs some minor work (as recommended by the reviewer) but 22. However, today, For example, minor revisions would not entail conducting a bunch of new analyses or overhauling part of the manuscript. I don't understand this, am I going through a fresh round of peer review? Did they just invite a single reviewer to check my resubmission? Or is the editor "reviewing" it? It's an Elsevier journal, and it's Status on Editorial Manager changed from “With Editor” on Friday to “Under Review”. The new reviewers But for a minor revision, it's common for the editor to approve the revision without needing to bounce back to the original reviewers (it's also common to send back to the original reviewers, I was told that for paper with "minor revision," it is likely like it will not be sent back to the reviewers. It roughly took around 19 days in total for this whole process. I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). I ask for a third opinion. I have a manuscript at Nature Communications that went out to review. Sorry! nothing found for. 24, accepted on 12. The editor is likely to focus on the reviewer who requested I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" 2. ) Keep in mind that neither a major nor a minor revision are approving the paper as is. In my field, it means that major rework (and probably new experiments/analysis) is needed and that that the editor may not see a possible way forward for the paper, but is giving you a chance to submit the reworked paper to the journal. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. Comments to Authors helps the authors improve their Peer Review in Progress. Major revision requires lots of work but A major revision was submitted to a journal. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" I submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses the ScholarOne system. that means that you flat out can’t make relatively minor changes to the I had a manuscript that was rejected after "minor revision. Did the editor find new reviewers for me? Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Now, after that reviewer completed the review, that status changed immediatly to "Review Completed" and then to "Decision in Process". Note that the time it takes for an editor to Popular Articles. " Related reading: Why Communicate clearly in submission, review and revision. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. 20 awaiting AE recommendation, awaiting EIC decision, minor revision 22. 4 awaiting reviewer score 22. 3. I received After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. They consider either being with the editor or the reviewers revision again. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. Then on September 19th, AE invited another batch of reviewers for review, and the invitation results were returned on September 25th (again, all reviewers rejected the invitation). same "review complete" status but different date. Major Revision: The manuscript may be accepted with major revisions. Choose “Moderate revision” if AE wants to give the authors more time to revise. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned For "good" business journals the rejection rate is something like: 30% desk rejected by the editor before going to review, 40-60% rejected in the first round of review, 10-20% rejected in subsequent rounds of review, only 5-10% papers submitted are actually published. At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Reject and resubmit papers Depends on the exact definition of "major revision" for that journal. This change has occurred Review was on time: The review was returned by the agreed due date, which is 3 weeks, if applicable, plus the approved extension from the day the reviewer responded to the review invitation. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. That said, it's very helpful if the same set of reviewers agree to review a revision. But from the Elsevier's tracking feature, I noticed one reviewer finished their review within 2 days of accepting the invitation. Pretty much the best outcome one can hope for in my field (biomedical science) when submitting to a decently high IF journal, I think? Do most of the post peer review rejections with these journals come after the first round of review? I got minor revision in the first round of review. "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" 2. uawba rany apmwaz qvrgyxed lft etrjllg cyvxz akydd gtsz ntyb